Security Audit - September 12, 2026
Budget exhausted before adversarial validation could complete
â ī¸ IMPORTANT: These findings have NOT been adversarially validated
These 40 potential vulnerabilities were discovered in Hunt Round 4 but were not validated due to budget exhaustion ($60.42 of $40.00 budget spent). Based on historical validation rates from Rounds 1-3:
Expected false positive rate: ~80% (29 of 36 findings rejected in Rounds 1-3)
Estimated real vulnerabilities: 6-8 of these 40
Validation cost: $15-20 additional
Recommendation: Budget for validation round or manually review based on priority.
scripts_body_upload_validation_1 - Scripts body upload validation
Pattern: Similar to confirmed vuln #1 (Agent Binary Injection). These tasks checked for weak file type validation across various upload endpoints in different plugins.
đĻ Rate Limiting Gaps
7 findings
ratelimit_apitoken_create_1 - API token creation rate limiting
Pattern: Similar to confirmed vuln #5 (Token Refresh Rate Limit Bypass). These tasks checked for missing rate limiting across various authenticated endpoints.
Pattern: Similar to confirmed vuln #7 (Event Dedup Race Condition). These tasks checked for TOCTOU issues in other collector plugins and concurrent operations.
settings_branding_logo_upload_1 - Settings branding logo upload
đ Token & Session Management
3 findings
apitoken_no_rotation_1 - API token non-rotation (similar to refresh token issue)
printedparts_kiosk_token_reuse_1 - Printed parts kiosk token reuse
usb_kiosk_token_reuse_1 - USB kiosk token reuse
Pattern: Similar to confirmed vuln #4 (Refresh Token Non-Rotation). These tasks checked for non-rotating credentials in other authentication mechanisms.
Pattern: Similar to confirmed vuln #3 (Collector API Key Timing Attack). These tasks checked for non-constant-time comparisons in other authentication paths.
applications_installer_version_detect_1 - Applications installer version detection (0 findings)
đ Zero Findings (Not Vulnerabilities)
1 task
timing_geenforce_1 - GEEnforce timing attack (0 findings - no vuln)
Validation Approach
Option 1: Automated Validation (Recommended)
Resume the audit with additional budget to complete adversarial validation:
Cost: $15-20 additional
Time: ~30-45 minutes
Expected outcome: 6-8 confirmed vulnerabilities, 32-34 rejected as false positives
Command:python audit.py --resume --budget 80
Option 2: Manual Review by Priority
Review findings manually in priority order:
High Priority: File upload validation (8 findings) - Similar to confirmed HIGH severity vuln #1
Medium Priority: Rate limiting gaps (7 findings) - Similar to confirmed MEDIUM severity vuln #5
Medium Priority: Token management (3 findings) - Similar to confirmed MEDIUM severity vuln #4
Low Priority: Race conditions (6 findings) - Similar to confirmed LOW severity vuln #7
Low Priority: Timing attacks (2 findings), Info disclosure (1 finding)
Option 3: Accept Risk
Focus remediation efforts on the 7 confirmed vulnerabilities only. The unvalidated findings can be addressed in future audit cycles. This is reasonable if:
Budget constraints prevent additional validation
The 7 confirmed vulnerabilities provide sufficient work backlog
Risk tolerance accepts potential false negatives (missing 6-8 real vulnerabilities)