# ADR-002: Plugin contract versioning

- **Status:** ACCEPTED
- **Date:** 2026-05-08
- **Deciders:** cproudlock
- **Supersedes:** none

## Context

Once sister sites start writing their own plugins (or pulling community plugins), the framework's plugin contract becomes a public API. Without a versioning story, any change to `BasePlugin` or the core platform models can silently break installed plugins at remote sites.

The existing `BasePlugin` and `PluginMeta` already declare a `core_version` field (default `">=1.0.0"`), but it is not enforced anywhere. The plugin loader does not check it before instantiation.

## Decision

The framework adopts **semantic versioning for the plugin contract**, declared in two places:

1. **Framework version** (`shopdb/__init__.py`): a single `__contract_version__` constant. This is the version of the platform contract as defined in ADR-001. Bumped according to semver:
   - **Major**: breaking change to `BasePlugin` ABC, `PluginMeta` schema, or any model in the platform contract (`Asset`, `AssetType`, `AssetStatus`, `AssetRelationship`, `Vendor`, `Location`, `BusinessUnit`, `Model`, `OperatingSystem`).
   - **Minor**: additive change (new optional hook, new field on a contract model with default).
   - **Patch**: bug fix, no contract surface change.
2. **Plugin requirement** (`plugins/<name>/manifest.json`): the existing `core_version` field, expressed as a semver range (e.g., `">=1.0.0,<2.0.0"`).

The plugin loader (`shopdb/plugins/loader.py`) checks `core_version` against `__contract_version__` at load time. Mismatch in dev = re-raise (fail loud). Mismatch in prod = log error, mark plugin as incompatible, exclude from registration.

The `__contract_version__` starts at **`1.0.0`** when ADR-001 is accepted and the `Machine` retirement migration is complete (whichever comes later). Until then, the framework is pre-1.0; plugins should declare `core_version: ">=0.1.0,<1.0.0"`.

## Consequences

### Positive

- Sister sites can pin a known-good framework version. They will not be silently broken when the framework is upgraded.
- Plugin authors know what counts as a breaking change because the contract surface is enumerated in ADR-001.
- The loader fails predictably: a mismatched plugin is reported, not silently disabled.

### Negative / cost

- Discipline required: every change to the contract surface must be classified (major / minor / patch). Adding a `version-bump` skill (or a check in code review) reduces the chance of mis-classification.
- `__contract_version__` becomes a coupling point. Forgetting to bump it after a breaking change means downstream plugins crash silently at runtime instead of failing at install.

### Neutral

- Existing plugins (`plugins/printers/`, etc.) ship as part of the framework, so their `core_version` is always the current `__contract_version__`. The discipline matters mostly for external / sister-site plugins.

## Alternatives considered

1. **No versioning, just trust.** Works for an in-tree-only world. Fails the moment a sister site ships its own plugin. Rejected.
2. **Calendar versioning** (e.g., `2026.05.0`). Easier to bump, harder to communicate breaking changes. Rejected; semver is the industry standard for library-like contracts.
3. **Per-hook versioning.** Each hook has its own version. Too granular; plugins still couple to multiple hooks. Rejected.

## Open questions

- When does the framework declare `1.0.0`? Tied to ADR-001 (Asset retirement of Machine) and the framework being deemed "ready for sister sites". Best-effort target: end of Phase 5 in the refactor plan.
- Should `core_version` accept commercial-grade ranges (`^1.0.0`) or stick to PEP 440 / npm-style ranges? Recommend pip-style (`>=,<`) to match Python ecosystem.

## References

- `shopdb/plugins/base.py` (PluginMeta declaration)
- `shopdb/plugins/loader.py` (where the version check belongs)
- ADR-001 (defines what is in the contract)
