ge-aerospace/shopdb-flask
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Record the code-signing decision
Some checks failed
CI / backend (push) Failing after 7s
Details
CI / naming (push) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 8s
Details
CI / migrations-mysql (push) Failing after 6s
Details

Browse Source 
Waiting for a certificate from the organisation's own certificate authority
rather than buying one from a public CA. Every server this installer runs on is
centrally managed and already trusts that root, so an internally issued
Authenticode certificate removes the unknown-publisher warning exactly where it
matters; a public certificate would buy trust on machines this software never
reaches.

Notes the interim measure that costs nothing: publish the SHA-256 through a
channel separate from the installer, since a hash beside the file is only as
trustworthy as write access to that location.

Wording avoids naming internal infrastructure, since docs/ is published.
This commit is contained in:
cproudlock
2026-08-04 21:25:14 -04:00
parent 1c04ff28b9
commit 412c2dc877
1 changed files with 17 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
docs/RELEASING-WINDOWS.md
View File

@@ -154,6 +154,23 @@ warning, and the SHA-256 is the only integrity check. This is the significant
remaining gap before wider distribution: a checksum published next to the file remaining gap before wider distribution: a checksum published next to the file
protects against corruption, not against someone who can write to that location. protects against corruption, not against someone who can write to that location.
The decision taken is to wait for a certificate from the organisation's own
certificate authority rather than buy one from a public CA. Every server this
installer runs on is centrally managed, and that CA's root is already trusted on
those machines, so an internally issued Authenticode certificate removes the
warning exactly where it matters. A public certificate would buy trust on
machines this software never reaches.
Until then, publish the SHA-256 through a channel SEPARATE from the installer
itself. A hash sitting beside the file is only as trustworthy as write access to
that location; a hash the operator gets another way means tampering has to
succeed twice.
Wiring it up afterwards is small: Inno has native SignTool support, so a
directive in the script and a signtool configuration on the build machine sign
the installer and its uninstaller. Include a timestamp server, or signatures
stop verifying when the certificate expires.
**Compiling requires Windows.** `build-installer.ps1` exists so the whole **Compiling requires Windows.** `build-installer.ps1` exists so the whole
process can run on a Windows workstation. Nothing about it runs in CI, so a process can run on a Windows workstation. Nothing about it runs in CI, so a
release is a deliberate act by a person. release is a deliberate act by a person.