Record the vendor naming cleanup in the changelog
This commit is contained in:
10
CHANGELOG.md
10
CHANGELOG.md
@@ -90,6 +90,16 @@ ADR-007 and ADR-002.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
### Fixed
|
### Fixed
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **The shipped catalog offered two ways to spell the same vendor, and one row
|
||||||
|
that should never have left a test.** `HP Inc.` and `Zebra Technologies` were
|
||||||
|
empty rows duplicating `HP` and `Zebra`, which carry every model between
|
||||||
|
them; neither exists in this site's database, so they would have arrived as
|
||||||
|
duplicates at a new site and nowhere else. `UnscopedLiveVendor` was a test
|
||||||
|
artifact: `export_catalog.py` reads the live development database, so a row
|
||||||
|
left behind by a lab run was published as reference data. The canonical name
|
||||||
|
is whichever spelling holds the entries, which is why it is `Dell Inc.` but
|
||||||
|
`HP` and `Zebra`. Vendors 51 to 48.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **The shipped seed catalog contained duplicate vendors, models and operating
|
- **The shipped seed catalog contained duplicate vendors, models and operating
|
||||||
systems.** Four space-stripped twins, each with a correctly spaced original
|
systems.** Four space-stripped twins, each with a correctly spaced original
|
||||||
already present, so a new site inherited the same company listed twice.
|
already present, so a new site inherited the same company listed twice.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user