2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
cproudlock
cebb3e9e44 Guides: make images render, and stop drafts leaking to readers
Images were a broken icon for every user. The stored URL was bound straight
to <img src>, and a plain image request carries no Authorization header while
this app keeps its JWT in one, so every fetch was a 401. They are now fetched
through the API client, which also fixes the stored '/api/...' path under a
subpath mount where the API is not at /api at all. A failed image says so in
words rather than rendering as a broken icon, and the editor's own thumbnails
go through the same path - an author needs to see the screenshot they pasted.

Revision and image routes gated on their parent guide. Both were gated on
guides.view alone, and revision ids are sequential, so being able to read one
guide was enough to walk the ids and read every unpublished draft on the site -
the opposite of what docs/GUIDES.md promises. An image in a PUBLISHED guide
still serves to any reader; one that only appears in a draft does not.

The guide list, the tag chips and search now match the PUBLISHED text rather
than the working copy. Matching the working copy handed readers a hit on
wording that is not in the page when they open it.

The slug no longer follows the title. It was regenerated on every save that
carried a title and the editor autosaves every three seconds, so fixing a typo
in a heading silently moved the URL and broke exactly the pasted links the
stored slug exists to protect.

publish() now aborts when the pre-publish save failed. It ran regardless, so
the author saw "Published version N" while readers got the previous revision.

Link rendering: text is escaped before formatting, so a captured URL arrives
carrying entities and was escaped a second time - every multi-parameter
ServiceNow and SharePoint link opened with &amp;amp; in it. Emphasis could also
reach inside an href, and '//host' passed as an in-app link when the browser
reads it as off-site.

Tests are now HTTP-level. The draft-invisibility rule lived entirely in routes
that no test executed, which is how three of them shipped serving drafts.
2026-08-26 15:04:09 -04:00
cproudlock
38d1e367fc Guides: write a procedure in ShopDB, not beside it
The knowledgebase plugin is a link registry - a description, a URL and some
keywords pointing at a document held somewhere else. That leaves the documents
themselves as HTML files on a share: no search, no history, no way to know
whether the copy pinned to a noticeboard is current, and no way for a technician
to tick off where they are.

A guide is stored as an ordered list of typed blocks rather than a blob of
HTML, because three of the four things this feature exists for depend on it. A
tickable step needs a stable id to be remembered; dark mode needs semantic
markup rather than pasted colours; and print needs to know where a step begins
so it does not split one across a page. Free HTML gives none of that and lets
pasted styling fight the theme.

Inline text is a restricted Markdown subset - bold, italic, inline code, links,
line breaks - escaped BEFORE formatting, so nothing an author pasted can reach
the DOM as markup. No fonts, sizes or colours: emphasis is semantic and the
theme decides how it looks. That is what makes a guide written next year match
one written today, and dark mode work without an author thinking about it.

DRAFTS AND VERSIONS. The guide row is the working copy; every save that changes
something writes an immutable revision; and a separate pointer says which
revision READERS get. Without that pointer, editing a live procedure changes it
under a technician who is halfway through following it. Publishing promotes an
existing revision rather than snapshotting, so a publish with unsaved edits
cannot ship a version nobody reviewed. Restoring writes a new revision with old
content, so the record of what people were told in between survives.

Saves dedup on a content hash covering title, summary, tags and blocks, so an
autosave that changed nothing writes no version - otherwise the history fills
with identical entries and hides the three edits that mattered.

Progress lives in the browser, not the database: shopfloor PCs share a login, so
per-user ticks would show one technician's progress to the next person on that
bay, which reads as "already done". Keyed by guide and version, because step 4
of version 3 is not step 4 of version 2.

Five permissions, and the split between edit and publish is the point: a
technician can write a procedure up while somebody else decides it is fit for
the floor. create-without-edit works too - an author may edit their own guide
until it is published, after which other people are following it.
2026-08-26 10:24:26 -04:00