Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
cproudlock
3606d8d696 feat(sbom): ship a CycloneDX bill of materials with every build
Some checks failed
CI / backend (push) Failing after 7s
CI / naming (push) Successful in 2s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 9s
CI / migrations-mysql (push) Failing after 7s
An air-gapped site cannot be scanned from anywhere else, so when a CVE lands the
only way to answer 'is that component here, and at what version' was to RDP in
and go looking. The frontend was the real blind spot: nothing recorded which
version of leaflet, dompurify, jspdf or html2canvas ends up inside the compiled
SPA.

scripts/generate_sbom.py emits CycloneDX 1.6 covering both ecosystems - every pin
in requirements.txt with the sha256 the installer enforces, and every package in
package-lock.json. Build-only npm packages are marked scope 'excluded' rather
than dropped, so 'not here' stays distinguishable from 'not looked for'.
Dependency edges are real: uv's '# via' comments give the Python graph and
package-lock gives the npm one.

Hand-rolled rather than cyclonedx-py plus cyclonedx-npm because both inputs are
already pinned and committed - this is a format translation, not a scan - and
because the build box may be a work PC with nothing but Python and Node. It is
deterministic by construction: same inputs, byte-identical output, so
regenerating does not churn.

Staged into the application tree by both builders, so it installs onto the
server with the app. shopdb-admin.ps1 verify reports it and searches it by
component name, which is the question actually being asked.

Packages appearing at several depths in package-lock (node_modules/vite and
node_modules/vitest/node_modules/vite) are merged, and a copy reachable outside
the dev tree makes the component count as shipped. Emitting both produced
duplicate bom-refs, which CycloneDX forbids and scanners reject; getting the dev
merge backwards would have hidden a shipped package from a CVE search.

Not covered by bundle-lock.json on purpose: its provenance is git, not the
third-party payload.
2026-08-03 13:15:27 -04:00
cproudlock
88af7fd9ce feat(installer): lock the third-party payload, and build on Windows without Bash
The bundle carries ~40 wheels, a Python installer and two MSIs. All of them run
as SYSTEM on the target server, and nothing verified any of them. A missing
wheelhouse printed MISSING and the script still exited 0, so an empty bundle
compiled into a shippable installer and the failure surfaced on an air-gapped
server with no way to fix it.

bundle-lock.json now records that payload exactly - sha256 and byte size per
file - and verification is set equality: a missing file, an unexpected extra
file, or changed content all fail. Both builders check it and refuse to produce
an unverified bundle; the lock ships inside the bundle and shopdb-install.ps1
re-checks it on the server before running any of it.

This is deliberately a layer above requirements.txt hashes. pip lists every
artifact of a pinned version (cffi 2.1.0 alone has 100 hashes), so it proves a
wheel is genuine, not that it is the wheel this bundle was built and tested
with; it ignores extra files in the wheelhouse; and it covers none of the
executables.

refresh-bundle-lock.ps1 regenerates the lock but refuses to overwrite one until
the operator has seen the diff, because the commit is the review - it is the
only place a change to what runs as SYSTEM becomes visible to a human.

build-installer.ps1 is the whole build natively on Windows, so a work PC needs
no Bash. It shares the plugin closure resolver with build-site.sh.

Both builders now copy the installer scripts from the repository. They were
copied from a downloads folder, so the logic that shipped was not the logic that
was committed and the build worked on exactly one machine.

Two verifiers exist because PowerShell is the only thing guaranteed present on
the target server, while the Linux builder should not need pwsh.
tests/test_bundle_lock.py runs both against the same fixtures and fails if they
disagree.
2026-08-03 11:17:45 -04:00