The publishability gate caught internal tooling names and developer paths but
nothing site-specific, so roughly sixty leaks reached the wiki: the site name in
ten documents, real fleet hostnames in the collector and GE-Enforce examples, an
internal database name through the whole import guide, imaging-share paths, and
a maintainer's username as the Deciders line of every ADR and inside a generated
curl example.
None of it is a security matter on an air-gapped fleet. It matters because these
pages are read by engineers at other plants, and a document that names one site
throughout reads as that site's notes rather than a product's documentation -
which is exactly what it then gets treated as.
Examples now use neutral hostnames, the site is "the reference site" where the
distinction carries meaning, and ADRs are decided by "ShopDB maintainers". The
gate carries all of these patterns, so the next one fails a build.
Two documents leave docs/ because they were never written for an outside reader.
PROJECT-REVIEW.md is an internal health memo pinned to a commit from July, whose
headline finding (an untracked playbook) has since been fixed - it is history,
and git holds it. PILOT-DEPLOY.md is one site's own cutover runbook, complete
with a "re-measure before publishing" placeholder; it moves next to the loader
it belongs to, in scripts/site_imports/wjf/.
ADR-015 is AMENDED rather than rewritten. Its enforcement section still said
report-only and its backlog still listed hardcodes that are now cleared, which
left the record contradicting itself. The amendment says what changed and why
the report-only period ended; the original text stays, because what the decision
looked like when it was taken is the part worth keeping.
Also corrects llms.txt's response envelope, which had errors at the top level
and pagination at meta.total. Both are nested one deeper, so anything written
against that description read undefined on every error it tried to handle.
An ACCEPTED ADR ended with a stray tool-call fragment - it said nothing to a
reader and everything about how the document was produced, which is not what a
decision record is for. And the cutover playbook carried a real internal IP in a
file otherwise correctly scrubbed to documentation ranges. Both were published.
The publishability gate now catches all three shapes, so the next one fails a
build instead of reaching the wiki.
The adoption guide also told a site to copy two files that ship from nowhere:
the asset reporter and EventSaver are both on the reference site's imaging
share, not in this repository, and the guide never said so - it could not be
followed as written. It now states, per artifact, where each comes from, which
of them are pending a move into this repository, and that EventSaver can be
rebuilt from its one source file rather than taken on trust as a binary.
Four data-only hooks on BasePlugin (get_settings_cards,
get_asset_panels, get_map_overlays, get_asset_presentation) with a
GET-only /api/pluginui consumer surface copying the dashboard-widgets
semantics. Pilots: warranty declares its asset panel; measuringtools
supplies its settings card, presentation, and calibration overlay -
the last hardcoded settings-nav entry is now hook-sourced. Generic
renderers for panels/overlays/presentation deferred per the ADR's
incremental adoption plan (documented in CONTRACT-STABILITY.md).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ADR-010 (PROPOSED): four data-only frontend hooks following the
get_reports precedent - get_settings_cards, get_asset_panels,
get_map_overlays, get_asset_presentation - batched as a future contract
0.7.0. Warranty proves asset panels first, measuringtools the rest;
accept only after both run on the hooks.
Display-label swap Equipment -> Machines across nav, list, form,
detail, search, map editor, and settings copy (incl the API-failure
fallback nav). Identifiers unchanged: plugin name, tables,
/api/equipment, asset type, and routes all stay.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
