DEPLOY-WINDOWS-IIS was a second copy of the manual IIS procedure that had
diverged from the first: a different MySQL version (8.0, which reached end of
life in April), a different port, a different plugin list, and a profile file
that does not exist. Two runbooks for one procedure means a reader follows
whichever they found, and one of them was wrong. INSTALL-WINDOWS-IIS covers
everything it did plus a preflight step and the subpath method, so the one
section it uniquely had - redeploying a hand-built server - is folded in there,
with the plugin-chain step it was missing and a note to back up first, and the
duplicate is gone. Everything that pointed at it now points at the survivor.
Three ADR statuses said something untrue.
ADR-013 said PROPOSED while half of it had shipped and ADR-014 had been accepted
on top of it. A decision that has been implemented and depended upon is not
proposed, and leaving one that way devalues every other status in the index. The
catalog half is still unbuilt, which is the ordinary state of an accepted
decision: accepted means settled, not delivered.
ADR-016 said ACCEPTED for a design where nothing is built - the endpoint and
permissions it describes do not exist, so a reader goes looking for them. The
status stands, because the decision does; the header now says so plainly and
points at where today's credentials actually live.
ADR-003 and ADR-004 were ACCEPTED with their own Decision lines still opening
"**PROPOSED:**", which reads as though the decision was never taken.
And the dashboard proposal carried Status: ACCEPTED, which belongs to a decision
record. A proposal is a proposal; the contract it produced is the ADR.
The publishability gate caught internal tooling names and developer paths but
nothing site-specific, so roughly sixty leaks reached the wiki: the site name in
ten documents, real fleet hostnames in the collector and GE-Enforce examples, an
internal database name through the whole import guide, imaging-share paths, and
a maintainer's username as the Deciders line of every ADR and inside a generated
curl example.
None of it is a security matter on an air-gapped fleet. It matters because these
pages are read by engineers at other plants, and a document that names one site
throughout reads as that site's notes rather than a product's documentation -
which is exactly what it then gets treated as.
Examples now use neutral hostnames, the site is "the reference site" where the
distinction carries meaning, and ADRs are decided by "ShopDB maintainers". The
gate carries all of these patterns, so the next one fails a build.
Two documents leave docs/ because they were never written for an outside reader.
PROJECT-REVIEW.md is an internal health memo pinned to a commit from July, whose
headline finding (an untracked playbook) has since been fixed - it is history,
and git holds it. PILOT-DEPLOY.md is one site's own cutover runbook, complete
with a "re-measure before publishing" placeholder; it moves next to the loader
it belongs to, in scripts/site_imports/wjf/.
ADR-015 is AMENDED rather than rewritten. Its enforcement section still said
report-only and its backlog still listed hardcodes that are now cleared, which
left the record contradicting itself. The amendment says what changed and why
the report-only period ended; the original text stays, because what the decision
looked like when it was taken is the part worth keeping.
Also corrects llms.txt's response envelope, which had errors at the top level
and pagination at meta.total. Both are nested one deeper, so anything written
against that description read undefined on every error it tried to handle.
Design record for distributing optional plugins across GE sites: a small
mandatory core plus a catalog of optional plugins, packaged as signed
versioned artifacts, served from a transport-agnostic read-only shelf (a
SharePoint-synced or sneakernet folder - untrusted either way because every
decision-bearing byte is signed), verified at adopt AND at every load and
migrate. Lean per-site builds stage only chosen plugins into the backend
image and SPA bundle.
Status PROPOSED. Grounds the design in the real loader/contract/migration/
frontend code and records defects to fix along the way (upgrade-all
migrating unadopted folders, enable-without-install, reverse-dep checks
blind to unloaded plugins, missing cycle detection and dependency closure,
hardcoded plugin imports in the SPA router). Honest on scope: the frontend
re-org is the long pole (one core-router change plus per-plugin relocation),
not a mechanical move. Phased 0-5 with schema-lean and runtime-JS delivery
explicitly deferred.
