The export gate now carries the site patterns, and three kinds of file tripped
it - two legitimately, one by construction.
Two test files held real internal subnets as fixtures. They are documentation
ranges now, which test the same logic and disclose nothing.
The project-map generator and a changelog entry named a file that is excluded
from publication, so a public reader was pointed at something they cannot see.
Both now describe what happened without naming it.
And the naming script has to CONTAIN the site patterns in order to grep for
them, so written literally the rule's own definition fails the gate that
enforces it. The patterns are assembled from fragments, the same trick the docs
publishability test already uses for the same reason. Verified the hard way: a
planted literal is still caught, so the fragmentation did not quietly turn the
rule into one that matches nothing - which is the obvious way for this fix to
have gone wrong.
CLAUDE.md is read at the start of every session and claimed contract 0.16.0 and
1159 tests while the code was at 0.18.0 and 1567, along with a plugin count and
a chain head that were both wrong. Hand-written facts about a moving codebase
are wrong within a fortnight, and a reader who cannot tell which lines are stale
has to re-derive all of them.
So they are derived. scripts/gen_project_map.py reads the versions, the plugin
inventory, every Alembic chain head, the ADR index with status and the size of
the codebase out of the code, and --check fails a build where the committed map
no longer matches. CLAUDE.md now points at it, leads with the multi-site rule,
and lists the gates to run instead of restating the conventions they enforce.
The changelog's Unreleased section covered 8 of the 46 commits since 0.9.0 and
had no Changed, Fixed or Security sections at all. It now carries the whole
fortnight, including both contract bumps - which had never been recorded even
though ADR-002 makes contract versions their own series.
