Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
cproudlock
4995456136 docs: take one site's name, hosts and paths off the public wiki
The publishability gate caught internal tooling names and developer paths but
nothing site-specific, so roughly sixty leaks reached the wiki: the site name in
ten documents, real fleet hostnames in the collector and GE-Enforce examples, an
internal database name through the whole import guide, imaging-share paths, and
a maintainer's username as the Deciders line of every ADR and inside a generated
curl example.

None of it is a security matter on an air-gapped fleet. It matters because these
pages are read by engineers at other plants, and a document that names one site
throughout reads as that site's notes rather than a product's documentation -
which is exactly what it then gets treated as.

Examples now use neutral hostnames, the site is "the reference site" where the
distinction carries meaning, and ADRs are decided by "ShopDB maintainers". The
gate carries all of these patterns, so the next one fails a build.

Two documents leave docs/ because they were never written for an outside reader.
PROJECT-REVIEW.md is an internal health memo pinned to a commit from July, whose
headline finding (an untracked playbook) has since been fixed - it is history,
and git holds it. PILOT-DEPLOY.md is one site's own cutover runbook, complete
with a "re-measure before publishing" placeholder; it moves next to the loader
it belongs to, in scripts/site_imports/wjf/.

ADR-015 is AMENDED rather than rewritten. Its enforcement section still said
report-only and its backlog still listed hardcodes that are now cleared, which
left the record contradicting itself. The amendment says what changed and why
the report-only period ended; the original text stays, because what the decision
looked like when it was taken is the part worth keeping.

Also corrects llms.txt's response envelope, which had errors at the top level
and pagination at meta.total. Both are nested one deeper, so anything written
against that description read undefined on every error it tried to handle.
2026-08-14 15:38:27 -04:00
cproudlock
802256f929 docs: wiki update for API docs, printer installer, geenforce cutover, timezone
Execute WIKI-UPDATE-PLAN.md (14 items):
- NEW docs/PRINTER-INSTALLER.md: install-list / pc-default / install-batch
  contract + public installer map page.
- NEW-shape docs/API-REFERENCE.md: index + pointer to the live generated docs
  (/api/docs Redoc, openapi.json, llms.txt, MCP), replacing a stale full dump.
- geenforce cutover + GE-ENFORCE-DISPLAY/CLIENT/DEPLOY: server-first display
  dispatcher (display-role by FQDN, display-type.txt fallback), dashboarddefaults
  FQDN keying, legacy kiosk autostart self-heal (Wow6432Node), per-PC-type
  cutover status.
- PLUGINS: printers/slides rows + plugin-permissions note (slides.manage).
- IMPORT-API: dashboarddefaults FQDN-first keying.
- CONFIG: word-wise search, site_timezone setting.
- PILOT-DEPLOY: servers-to-network reclassify step. IMPORT-ADOPTION: fixup note.
- CLAUDE.md: test count 1077->1159, HTTPS-cutover state. CHANGELOG: timezone +
  kiosk-autostart fixes, site_timezone setting.
2026-07-30 16:05:21 -04:00
cproudlock
8dceb8812f Add GE-Enforce agent deployment: Install-GEEnforce.ps1 + deploy doc
All checks were successful
CI / backend (push) Successful in 1m36s
CI / naming (push) Successful in 1s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 8s
Closes the "how do sites actually deploy GE-Enforce" gap (esp. OOBE-ppkg sites
without a PXE/WinPE step). Site-neutral + imaging-path independent.

- plugins/geenforce/client/Install-GEEnforce.ps1: a bootstrap that writes the
  PC's identity (C:\Enrollment\pc-type.txt is what determines the PC type; plus
  machine-number/cmm version/cmm id/site-config as needed), sets the shopdb
  BaseUrl + token in HKLM:\SOFTWARE\GE\ShopDB, deploys the client kit, optionally
  copies the engine from -EngineSource, and registers the SYSTEM scheduled task
  (at logon + every N min). Idempotent; fails loud (installer, not the fail-safe
  runtime). Engine is REFERENCED not vendored - it belongs to the GE-Enforce
  framework; the script warns if absent but still labels the PC.
- docs/GE-ENFORCE-DEPLOY.md: the deploy contract - the three things a PC needs
  (client, identity, credential), the identity table (what determines PC type,
  no auto-detection - the provisioner supplies it; shopdb cannot set it at
  imaging), and how to invoke per path (PXE step, OOBE ppkg via
  ProvisioningCommands, Intune, manual), the engine boundary, and verification.
- Cross-linked from docs/GE-ENFORCE.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 23:02:54 -04:00