cbdfcbabb774a1d84aff97bc0c3f62d2622e05fb
9 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1a8f426e93 |
Make revoking final, keep password rules in one place, drop a grant nobody read
Three credential and authz findings, all the same shape: a second path to a
decision, with weaker rules than the path built for it.
PUT /api/apitokens/<id> {"isactive": true} un-revoked a token, and the ORIGINAL
secret worked again - so "revoked" meant "paused until somebody flips it back",
for a credential whose secret is assumed to be out by the act of revoking it.
Revocation is one way now. Deactivating through the same route still works;
bringing one back does not, and the refusal says to mint a new token.
PUT /api/users/<self> accepted a `password` field with no current-password
proof and no length rule, while /api/auth/change-password requires both. When
two routes reach the same state the weaker one is the real rule, so the stronger
one was decoration. Changing your own password through the users route is
refused and points at the right endpoint. An ADMIN may still set one - that is
how a temporary password is issued - with the same 8-character floor, and
mustchangepassword is now set, because a password somebody else chose is
temporary by definition.
tools.secrets was declared guest-grantable, so the role grid offered it and
stored it, and the secure-send route never consulted the guest role at all: it
decides on securesend_allow_guests, which fails closed and carries the rate
limit. Ticking the box changed nothing in either direction, so the screen and
the behaviour disagreed. The declaration is gone; tools.view stays, because it
really does gate the nav entry.
Removing it needed care: update_role refuses the WHOLE request when a submitted
permission is not grantable, and the grid resubmits what the role already holds,
so a site whose guest role held tools.secrets could no longer save that role at
all - the deadlock fixed in
|
||
|
|
723a4ff19b |
Declare the guest grants that already shipped
Inverting the grantable rule from the .view suffix to explicit declaration dropped every permission that had qualified by how it was spelled. Two of them were shipped guest features with grants already in the field. guides.view: the nav item and list_guides both reason in comments about a signed-out reader holding it, and the route is written around one - drafts are filtered out, search matches the published revision so draft wording cannot leak through a hit, and the author branches cannot open for a caller with no user id. tools.view: without it a guest holding tools.secrets has permission to use Secure Send and no way to reach the page, because tools.view is what puts the entry in the nav. The tools themselves run in the browser and touch no data. The failure was worse than a missing checkbox. update_role refuses the WHOLE request when any submitted permission is undeclared, and the role grid resubmits what the role already holds, so a site that granted either of these under the old rule could no longer save the guest role at all - including to tick assets.view, which is the grant the shop floor needs to look up an asset number without signing in. The test asserts both stay grantable, so narrowing the set again means looking at what is already granted in the field rather than only at what the catalogue declares. Scope: product |
||
|
|
03a1151a5a |
Tech Tools is reachable by the people it was built for
Every tool on that page is usable without an account, on purpose - the routes carry no requiresAuth and say so - and Secure Send is the one write this product offers a guest. The sidebar entry still never appeared for them: it named no permission, so the filter that decides what a signed-out visitor may see had nothing to go on and dropped it. The plugin had no read permission to name, only tools.secrets, so it gains tools.view: reaching the page at all. The tools themselves run in the browser and touch no data, which is why this is about whether the entry appears rather than about what anybody can read. The item names either right. Somebody granted only Secure Send needs the entry that leads to it, and a manager who holds neither still does not see it. |
||
|
|
151d7c4f44 |
Anyone not signed in holds the guest role
Whether somebody with no account may see something was being answered one feature at a time: a securesend_allow_guests setting, an enable flag per kiosk, and very nearly a third for guides - each with its own settings page, its own vocabulary and its own hand-written branch inside a route. Every one of them answered a permissions question, and this app already administers permissions per role. So a caller with no token is not nobody: they hold the seeded `guest` role. require_permission consults it when there is no identity, which is the entire mechanism. The role is seeded holding NOTHING, so an upgrade opens no door; a site opens one by ticking a box in the same grid it uses for every other role, and closes it the same way. Revocation is read on every request rather than cached, because taking guest access away is what somebody does the moment they realise what they opened, and it has to bite immediately. The redundant @jwt_required() above require_permission is gone from 184 routes. It was belt-and-braces before; now it is actively wrong, because it refuses a request with no token before the permission check can have an opinion, so a grant would appear to do nothing. What a guest may hold is bounded. Any .view or .read permission is grantable. A WRITE has to be blessed by whoever owns it, through the new get_guest_grantable_permissions hook (contract 0.21.0), and Secure Send is the only case that exists: sending a password to a vendor is the one write this product means to offer somebody who never signs in. Everything else is refused by the API and greyed out in the grid rather than warned about - a checkbox that quietly makes deleting an asset anonymous is not a warning anybody reads twice. A guest write records no creator: the trail says when and from where, never who, and that is the reason for the bar. GE-Enforce and Slides gained read permissions so they can be opened to guests without handing out the manage right. Their read routes accept either through require_any_permission, so nothing an existing manager could reach has moved. The navigation endpoint now returns only what the caller can actually reach. Without that a signed-out visitor gets a sidebar of the whole app where every link bounces off the login page, which reads as a broken site rather than as a closed door. A nav item may name several permissions; holding any one is enough, which is what GE-Enforce and Slides need now that a viewer and a manager hold different strings. Two things this found on the way: current_user is a LocalProxy, so `current_user is None` is False for a request with nobody behind it - harmless under a required JWT, an AttributeError the moment verification became optional. And an image pasted into a guide before its first save was never attached to it, so it was visible to editors and invisible to every reader; saving now attaches it, and `flask guides fix-images` repairs what is stored. The guides guest setting written earlier today is gone. Granting guides.view to the guest role replaces it, which is the point. |
||
|
|
2ad2bd1b90 |
Sidebar sections are DECLARED, not guessed from a position number
The section headings were derived from position ranges: 10-29 became Assets, 30-49 became Information. A number is for ORDER; it was never a statement about meaning, and using it as one meant a plugin landed in whichever bucket its number happened to fall in. That is how USB Devices - an asset - came to sit under Information beside GE-Enforce and Tech Tools, and 3D Parts with it. Nobody chose that. It also meant two plugins picking the same number silently reordered each other: Warranties and Guides both held 8, the tie broke on plugin load order, and Guides rendered under Warranties rather than under Slides where it was asked to go. Warranties moves to 9. Each nav item now names its section and the renderer groups by what was declared. An item with no section stays in the unlabelled group at the top, which is the safe default: it appears, it is simply not filed. Assets gains USB Devices and 3D Parts. GE-Enforce and Tech Tools move to a new Fleet section - they are neither assets nor reference material, and calling them Information was only ever an artefact of their position numbers. Also: sorting used `position || 99`, and 0 is falsy in JavaScript, so Dashboard - the only item that uses 0 - sorted to the end of its own group. |
||
|
|
81575e46ca |
Give the guest setting somewhere to be changed
Reported: no Tools section in Settings. The setting existed in the database and had no page, which from a person's side is indistinguishable from the feature not existing. get_settings_defaults SEEDS a setting. get_settings_cards (ADR-010) is what puts it in the rail. Declaring only the first is a silent half-feature: nothing fails, no test notices, and the switch is unreachable. The page states the cost where the DECISION is made rather than in a document nobody opens - turn it on and it says a guest-created link records no creator, so the audit trail can say when and from where but never who. Admin-only, like every other settings page, because this one decides whether an unauthenticated caller may write to the site. Also caught while wiring it: the card asked for a 'shield' icon, which is not in the settings iconMap, so it would have rendered the fallback puzzle piece - the glyph that reads as "nobody chose this". Uses wrench, matching Tech Tools. The row still comes from `flask plugin upgrade-all`; the card appears either way, and without the row the page loads empty. |
||
|
|
8750ba2e74 |
Let a site open secure send to guests, and choose how many times a link opens
Two asks, and the first is a real security decision so it is a SETTING that defaults to the safe answer rather than a code change somebody inherits. securesend_allow_guests, OFF by default. With it off the model is unchanged: a login plus tools.secrets. With it on, somebody with no account - at a shared bay terminal, a contractor - can create a link too. The cost is named in the setting's own description and pinned by a test: a guest secret has NO CREATOR, so the audit trail can say when and from where but never who. That is the whole reason it is a switch a person turns on deliberately. IT FAILS CLOSED. A missing row, a half-migrated site, an unhappy database - the answer is no. An error must never be the thing that opens an unauthenticated write endpoint. A SIGNED-IN USER STILL NEEDS THE PERMISSION even when guests are allowed, which is surprising enough that a test pins it: opening the door to guests is a decision about the door, not about revoking what a role holds. Guest creation is rate limited per address, same shape as the login limiter. Not a security boundary - a determined person has more addresses - but an open endpoint should not be an easy place to park data or fill a disk. VIEWS ARE NOW A NUMBER, 1 to 100, instead of a four-item dropdown. How many people need a password is the sender's business: a shift handover is not one colleague on a call. The floor is what matters, not the ceiling - unlimited views would just be a password on a web page. Also folded in, from the retention question: nothing removed a secret that EXPIRED WITHOUT BEING OPENED. The recipient goes on holiday, the link is never clicked, and the ciphertext sat there for good - not readable, but it made "nothing lingers" untrue and grew the table in exactly the case where the feature failed. Any create now sweeps expired rows and a late click tidies its own, so it stays bounded without a scheduler an air-gapped site would never add. Two gates caught mistakes on the way: current_user is a LocalProxy and is never None, so `current_user is None` silently took the signed-in branch for a guest; and cache was imported straight from shopdb.extensions when it is already on the shopdb.api contract surface. 1836 tests green. |
||
|
|
d4b49b91b4 |
Move secure send into Tech Tools, where somebody would look for it
|
||
|
|
f66763e6df |
tools: a Tech Tools section, starting with codes on label stock
A place for the small utilities a technician reaches for at a bench. The plugin owns no API and no tables: every tool runs entirely in the browser, so an air-gapped site gets them for free and a bad network cannot break them. Adding the next tool is a view, a route, and one entry in tools.js. First tool is a barcode/QR generator. Content is typed text, a URL, or a CSV (content,label,copies - quoted fields and an optional header both handled), so a batch of a few hundred is one paste. Label stock is adjustable in inches with five presets, and the code renders to an SVG data URI rather than a PNG: a bitmap gets downscaled to label size and smears the module edges a scanner reads, where SVG rasterizes at the printer's resolution with hard edges. It also carries the dot-grid rule that is easy to get wrong by eye. A thermal head cannot render a fraction of a dot, so a code sized off the grid gets uneven modules; pick a DPI and the page says what the current size lands on and what to use instead. The quiet zone is blank label rather than white baked into the code, so it can be tuned - and it applies to CODE128 too, which needs clear space at each end and was letting bars run into the caption. Tech Tools is the first bundled plugin that owns no schema, which two guards did not model: it belongs in the universal installer profile, and upgrade-all reports it 'no-migrations' where every plugin was assumed to report 'ok'. The migration test now asserts that status explicitly for schema-less plugins, so a table-owning plugin whose chain went missing still fails. |