An air-gapped site cannot be scanned from anywhere else, so when a CVE lands the
only way to answer 'is that component here, and at what version' was to RDP in
and go looking. The frontend was the real blind spot: nothing recorded which
version of leaflet, dompurify, jspdf or html2canvas ends up inside the compiled
SPA.
scripts/generate_sbom.py emits CycloneDX 1.6 covering both ecosystems - every pin
in requirements.txt with the sha256 the installer enforces, and every package in
package-lock.json. Build-only npm packages are marked scope 'excluded' rather
than dropped, so 'not here' stays distinguishable from 'not looked for'.
Dependency edges are real: uv's '# via' comments give the Python graph and
package-lock gives the npm one.
Hand-rolled rather than cyclonedx-py plus cyclonedx-npm because both inputs are
already pinned and committed - this is a format translation, not a scan - and
because the build box may be a work PC with nothing but Python and Node. It is
deterministic by construction: same inputs, byte-identical output, so
regenerating does not churn.
Staged into the application tree by both builders, so it installs onto the
server with the app. shopdb-admin.ps1 verify reports it and searches it by
component name, which is the question actually being asked.
Packages appearing at several depths in package-lock (node_modules/vite and
node_modules/vitest/node_modules/vite) are merged, and a copy reachable outside
the dev tree makes the component count as shipped. Emitting both produced
duplicate bom-refs, which CycloneDX forbids and scanners reject; getting the dev
merge backwards would have hidden a shipped package from a CVE search.
Not covered by bundle-lock.json on purpose: its provenance is git, not the
third-party payload.
Two guards for a server deployed by hand, which the West Jefferson production
box is.
An existing venv is reused, which is right for a repair or an upgrade of an
install this made, and wrong when the venv belongs to a different Python. The
wheelhouse is tagged for one minor version, so pip finds no candidate for the
compiled packages and dies partway through - after Python has been installed and
the application tree replaced. The two versions are now compared up front and
the run stops with both numbers and what to do about it.
Switching deployment method removes the other method's IIS artifact. That is
correct when this installer owns both and dangerous when it does not: a wrong
-MountAlias would call Remove-WebApplication on a live mount with no prompt and
no error, and the first sign would be the site returning 404. It now refuses
unless a version stamp shows this installer made the install, or -AdoptExisting
is passed, and the refusal lists exactly what it would have removed.
The bundle carries ~40 wheels, a Python installer and two MSIs. All of them run
as SYSTEM on the target server, and nothing verified any of them. A missing
wheelhouse printed MISSING and the script still exited 0, so an empty bundle
compiled into a shippable installer and the failure surfaced on an air-gapped
server with no way to fix it.
bundle-lock.json now records that payload exactly - sha256 and byte size per
file - and verification is set equality: a missing file, an unexpected extra
file, or changed content all fail. Both builders check it and refuse to produce
an unverified bundle; the lock ships inside the bundle and shopdb-install.ps1
re-checks it on the server before running any of it.
This is deliberately a layer above requirements.txt hashes. pip lists every
artifact of a pinned version (cffi 2.1.0 alone has 100 hashes), so it proves a
wheel is genuine, not that it is the wheel this bundle was built and tested
with; it ignores extra files in the wheelhouse; and it covers none of the
executables.
refresh-bundle-lock.ps1 regenerates the lock but refuses to overwrite one until
the operator has seen the diff, because the commit is the review - it is the
only place a change to what runs as SYSTEM becomes visible to a human.
build-installer.ps1 is the whole build natively on Windows, so a work PC needs
no Bash. It shares the plugin closure resolver with build-site.sh.
Both builders now copy the installer scripts from the repository. They were
copied from a downloads folder, so the logic that shipped was not the logic that
was committed and the build worked on exactly one machine.
Two verifiers exist because PowerShell is the only thing guaranteed present on
the target server, while the Linux builder should not need pwsh.
tests/test_bundle_lock.py runs both against the same fixtures and fails if they
disagree.
Roughly 2500 lines of tested installer had been living in ~/Downloads and an
untracked folder - nothing was under version control.
It goes here rather than in a repo of its own because it depends on application
internals: the `flask plugin` verbs, site-profile.json, MOUNT_PATH, and the
plugin registry. Versioned separately it would drift out of step with the thing
it installs.
Contents: the read-only preflight, the staged installer (bundled MySQL, runtime,
schema, IIS, verify, uninstall), the operator console, the Inno Setup wizard, the
bundle builder and the artwork generator.
bundle/ and Output/ are ignored - regenerable, and ~220MB. plugins.iss is ignored
because build-installer.sh generates it from the staged payload. The artwork IS
committed so a Windows build box does not need Python and cairosvg.
Verified end to end on Windows Server 2025 against a bundled MySQL 8.0 and an
existing MySQL 5.6: fresh install, upgrade with backup and rollback, re-run
idempotency, uninstall, and both deployment methods including switching between
them. Not yet verified: a hypervisor-level air-gapped run, and any load from a
real browser (every HTTP check so far used curl, which sends no Origin header).
