Files
shopdb-flask/docs
cproudlock 5de3fe4b40
Some checks failed
CI / backend (push) Failing after 7m11s
CI / naming (push) Failing after 7m6s
CI / migrations-mysql (push) Has been cancelled
CI / frontend (push) Has been cancelled
Note secret sharing as a tabled tool, with the reasoning attached
Evaluated a Password-Pusher-style service as a Tech Tool and tabled it. The note
carries the decisions rather than just the idea, because those are what cost the
time: it is NOT a Tools-plugin candidate as it stands (that plugin is browser
only by design, with get_blueprint and get_models both empty), the sender must
always be authenticated, a FILE recipient should be logged in too - which costs
nothing on an intranet-only server where anyone who can resolve the link already
has an account - and zero-knowledge encryption is right for a credential but
questionable for a controlled document, where a server that cannot say what was
shared is a liability rather than a feature.

Intranet-only hosting is what makes the idea viable at all: a link mailed
outside is dead and no ciphertext reaches a third party. Pointing staff at the
public hosted instance instead would reinstate every problem this avoids.
2026-08-21 09:18:51 -04:00
..
2026-08-20 08:45:56 -04:00