Files
shopdb-flask/tools
cproudlock 6d9954c6f9
Some checks failed
CI / naming (push) Successful in 3s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 13s
CI / migrations-mysql (push) Successful in 42s
CI / backend (push) Has been cancelled
Add push and promote scripts for the wj branch
wj holds this site's work; main is the product every other site sees and the
publication mirror exports. Two scripts, one for each direction.

tools/git-push.sh pushes a branch without leaving the token behind. The way this
was being done by hand - rewrite remote.origin.url to embed the token, push,
rewrite it back - writes the token into .git/config in plaintext on every push,
and leaves it there if the push fails or the terminal closes mid-way, where
`git remote -v` will happily print it. Putting it in the URL on the command line
is no better: argv is visible in `ps` to every user on the box. The token now
goes in through GIT_ASKPASS, so it never reaches the config or the process list
and there is nothing to clean up when the script dies.

tools/promote-to-main.sh cherry-picks NAMED commits onto main, rather than
merging the branch. Merging takes the site-specific work along with the product
work, which is how a site branch quietly becomes the product; naming the commits
keeps that decision explicit and per change.

It runs main's gates after the pick and before any push, and does not push at
all - it prints what landed and leaves that to a human. The ADR-015 site-literal
check is the one that earns its place: it catches a hostname or share path
riding along in a commit that looked generic, which is the failure that makes a
site branch dangerous rather than merely awkward. It caught this very commit,
which named the site in a comment.

Both refuse a dirty tree. Pushing one pushes the last commit rather than what is
in front of you, and cherry-picking from one mixes uncommitted work into the
promotion. On failure the promote script aborts the pick and returns you to the
branch you started on, with main untouched.
2026-08-30 08:46:14 -04:00
..