Import-surface docs and docstrings describe the automation as a migration script; status-doc references in CHANGELOG/ADR-009/ROADMAP point at repo files. Screenshot/verify tools write to /tmp/shopdb-shots (created on import) instead of a machine-specific directory.
5.5 KiB
Roadmap
shopdb-flask is at __contract_version__ = '0.11.0' (pre-1.0; product __version__ 0.7.0, tags through v0.7.0). This document captures what stands between today and a stable 1.0.0 release. Maintained as scope evolves; supersedes nothing in the ADRs.
Phase status
| Phase | Status | Commit |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - Lock platform contract, naming, style enforcement | DONE | d6725c0 |
| 1 - pytest baseline, production hardening, pinned requirements | DONE | 2d1bb83 |
| 2 - Plugin contract surface and compliance tests | DONE | 5fefb53 |
| 3 - Manifest-first loader, shopdb.api namespace, auto-register blueprints | DONE | 6f085a1 |
4 - Plugin scaffolding (flask plugin new) |
DONE | 8eb9362 |
| 5 - Alembic baseline, per-site deploy, ADRs to docs/adr | DONE | d4e3ac9 |
| 6 - Multi-site distribution readiness (settings-driven branding/ServiceNow/floor plan, security closeout, docs + Docker frontend build, release engineering) | DONE | v0.5.0-v0.7.0 |
The last big milestone before 1.0 is the legacy-ASP data import plus a production pilot deployment; the framework work below is what remains after that.
What's left before tagging 1.0.0
Must-have
- Asset model fully wired.
Asset.mapx, Asset.mapycolumns,AssetRelationship.inheritsposition,AssetRelationship.propagatesthroughidcolumns. Models match the locked ADR-001 surface thatresolve_asset_positionalready targets. - Equipment data migration script for facilities migrating from legacy ASP shopdb. One-shot script under
scripts/migration/. Per ADR-001, onlycategory='Equipment' AND machinenumber IS NOT NULLmigrates. - Printers retirement. Legacy
PrinterDatamodel,printers_bplegacy blueprint, and the frontendPrinterForm.vuereferences toprinter.printerdata.*get removed in lockstep. Coordinated with the equipment migration. - External plugin UI packaging. The Vue-side hook contract ships (ADR-010: get_settings_cards / get_asset_panels / get_map_overlays / get_asset_presentation) and route gating is backend-driven (ADR-009), but plugin routes/views still live in core
frontend/src. Let an external plugin ship its own Vue bundle so adopters can add UI without editing core.
Nice-to-have
- Full palette theming.
brand_primary_colorand a few brand colors are settings-driven, but the rest of the CSS palette (surfaces, borders, accents) is still hardcoded instyle.css. A complete theming pass would expose the palette as CSS variables a site can override, not just the brand colors. - Frontend scaffolding skill (the backend has
flask plugin new; the frontend stub is currently manual copy-paste). - Marketplace listing site (PLUGINS.md is a one-pager; a proper listing with links to sister-site plugins becomes useful when there are more than three external plugins).
- Plugin contract surface diff tooling. Today version bumps are manual judgment; a CI check that diffs the contract surface against the previous tag would catch missed bumps. See ADR-002.
- Calibration cycles, maintenance windows, downtime tracking (domain extensions; would likely live in the
machinesandmeasuringtoolsplugins).
Deferred (out of scope for 1.0)
- Multi-tenancy (rejected by ADR-004; revisit only if more than five sites adopt and operational overhead becomes painful).
- Pip-installable plugins (deferred per ADR-003 v2). Filesystem distribution stays the v1 model.
- Event bus on
BasePlugin(removed per ADR-001; add via new ADR if a real use case appears). - Frontend rebuild beyond Vue 3 + Pinia + Vite (the existing stack is fine).
What 1.0.0 means
Tagging 1.0.0 is a commitment that the contract surface is stable for at least the next minor version cycle. Plugin authors at sister sites can pin core_version: ">=1.0.0,<2.0.0" and trust their plugin will not break on framework patches.
Concretely, 1.0.0 ships when:
- ADR-001's full contract surface is implemented in code, not just documented (
Asset.mapx,RelationshipType.propagatesthroughid, etc.) - The contract test suite covers every documented hook with both happy-path and a "broken plugin" failure-isolation test
- At least one external plugin (likely
measuringtoolsfrom the scaffold canary) has been built end-to-end with no contract changes required mid-build - The deploy runbook (DEPLOY.md) has been validated by an actual fresh-host deploy
Decision log pointers
When a roadmap item gets prioritized, document the why in a new ADR and link from this file. The ADRs are the canonical source for design decisions; this file is the prioritized backlog.
- ADR-001 - Asset as platform contract
- ADR-002 - Plugin contract versioning
- ADR-003 - Plugin distribution model
- ADR-004 - Deployment topology (per-site)
- ADR-005 - Equipment vs measuringtools
- ADR-006 - Collector contract pattern
- ADR-007 - Product versioning and releases
- ADR-008 - Plugin migration ownership (per-plugin chains)
- ADR-009 - Frontend plugin route gating
- ADR-010 - Frontend plugin hook contract
- ADR-011 - Machines rename + modeltypes retyping
- ADR-012 - GE-Enforce manifest ownership