Stop naming remote-access schemes as if they were constants
A link is built by formatting that protocol's own linktemplate, and the
templates are rows in accessprotocols that a site can edit. So no scheme
is a fixed fact about the product, and writing one down as though it were
misleads whoever reads it next.
Two places did. The guest-grant docstring said the detail route resolves
"working rdp:// and vnc:// links", which is wrong for the row we actually
ship: VNC is com.realvnc.vncviewer.connect://{host}:{port}, the RealVNC
handler, not vnc://. And the protocol admin form offered vnc://{host}:{port}
as its placeholder, in the one screen where somebody authors a new template,
so the example contradicted the seeded data it sits next to.
Neither changes behaviour. _computer_access_links already reads the
template from the database and the frontend only ever renders the resolved
link, so nothing in the code assumed a scheme - only the prose did.
Scope: product
This commit is contained in:
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
|
||||
</label>
|
||||
<label class="field">
|
||||
<span>Link template</span>
|
||||
<input v-model="form.linktemplate" type="text" maxlength="255" placeholder="vnc://{host}:{port}" />
|
||||
<input v-model="form.linktemplate" type="text" maxlength="255" placeholder="scheme://{host}:{port}" />
|
||||
<small class="muted">Placeholders: <code>{host}</code>, <code>{port}</code>, <code>{scheme}</code></small>
|
||||
</label>
|
||||
<label class="field checkbox">
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user