Files
shopdb-flask/docs/API-REFERENCE.md
cproudlock 581baafee0 Remove the Swagger try-it page
It shipped 1.77 MB of vendored assets to every site - swagger-ui-bundle.min.js
alone is larger than Redoc - in order to provide an Execute button that only the
development config ever enabled. Production config had it off, testing had it
off hard, and when off the routes were never bound at all. The staticdocs
directory drops from 2.9 MB to 1.1 MB, and there is one fewer vendored
dependency to track for licences and advisories.

What replaces it: an agent has the MCP server's shopdb_call, and a human has
Redoc for reading plus the 324 harvested examples in the spec for a curl that is
mostly copy-paste. The read-only page was always the one that mattered.

The tests this leaves behind are the interesting part. That file was named for
try-it but half of it proved things about the page that stays, above all that
nothing it loads comes from the internet, which is what a CDN reference costs on
an air-gapped box. Those are kept and the file is renamed for what it covers.

Pointing the air-gap test at redoc.standalone.js immediately failed: the bundle
still carried a trailing sourceMappingURL for a .map that was never vendored,
so every devtools open was a guaranteed 404 with no internet to fall back on.
That was visible in a browser console and nobody had chased it, because the test
had only ever been parametrised over the two Swagger files. The pragma is gone
and the assertion now checks the TRAILING pragma specifically: Redoc's own code
contains that string three more times, in a data: URI it assembles and in a
worker blob, and a blunt "not in body" assertion fails on correct code.

A first attempt to strip it with a line-anchored pattern removed 507 KB, because
the bundle is minified onto long lines. Hence the anchored, byte-exact removal
and the assertion that can tell a directive from source.
2026-09-20 14:57:37 -04:00

4.8 KiB

API reference

The reference is generated and served by the app. This page is a pointer to it, plus the two things a specification cannot tell you.

There used to be a hand-written endpoint list here. It competed with the generated spec, lost, and went stale in between - so it was cut rather than maintained. Everything it listed is in the spec, derived from the code: every operation with its auth, its query parameters, its response shape and harvested examples. Counts are in PROJECT-MAP, which is generated; nothing of that kind belongs on this page.

Where the generated reference is

Reach it at What it is
GET /api/docs The reference, rendered with Redoc. The bundle is vendored in the image, so it renders with no network - which is the only reason it is usable on an air-gapped site.
GET /api/docs/openapi.json The raw OpenAPI 3.1 spec. Also tracked as docs/openapi.json, so it can be read from a checkout without running anything; regenerate with scripts/gen_openapi.py after any API change.
GET /api/docs/llms.txt The short version, for a machine caller. Also llms.txt in this corpus.

llms.txt is not a second spec. It is the orientation a caller needs before the spec is useful: the response envelope, how authentication is obtained and sent, the pagination and filtering conventions, and the handful of recipes people get wrong. Read it first, then look operations up in the spec.

Which surface owns what

The spec lists every operation; it does not say which contract governs one. There are three surfaces, and the third is everything else.

Surface Who calls it Where its semantics live
Fleet and client contracts Shop-floor PCs, the endpoint agent, kiosks, displays and printer installers - machines, not browsers COLLECTOR-INTEGRATION, COLLECTOR-PAYLOADS, COLLECTOR-AUTH, PRINTER-INSTALLER, EVENTSAVER
Bulk import A script loading a site's data. There is no separate import surface: it drives the same endpoints the UI does, with a header that preserves the source rows' timestamps IMPORT-API
Core UI API The Vue frontend, and anything else holding a token CONTRACT-STABILITY for what is safe to depend on

How auth works at a glance

Four credentials, and which one an operation takes follows from its surface. The spec states it per operation; this is the shape behind it.

  • JWT - a login token or a Personal Access Token. The core UI API.
  • Scoped service token - X-API-Key or Authorization: Bearer, minted and revoked per purpose (collector.ingest, collector.ingest.endpoints). A token can be bound to specific resources and is refused anything outside them. This is what the fleet uses.
  • A per-PC credential - an enrolled endpoint holds its own secret, and revoking one endpoint costs nothing to the rest. See COLLECTOR-AUTH and ADR-019.
  • A kiosk device token, or an address inside the kiosk's allowlist - a credential for a screen, not authorization for a person. It says which cabinet is asking; the badge on the request says who is standing at it. Both kiosks are off by default and answer 404, not 403, when they are off.

Two rules cover almost everything else:

  • Every read is behind a permission. Reading is not free, and a site decides what a signed-out visitor may see by granting the seeded guest role the read permissions it chooses - in the same role grid it uses for staff.
  • Every mutation needs a JWT and a permission or role. None are public.

What is reachable with no credential

This is the inventory a firewall or a deployment reviewer asks for, and it is the one question the spec answers badly - it is a question about the whole surface, not about any one operation.

Do not read it off a page somebody maintains. It is enumerated, with a reason per entry, in tests/test_core/test_public_read_surface.py, which fails the build when a new public read appears without being added to the list. That file is the answer, and it is the answer because it cannot go stale without turning CI red.

See also

  • CONFIG - the environment variables and settings behind these endpoints, including the public settings allowlist.
  • CONTRACT-STABILITY - what a sister site may depend on, and how tightly to pin.
  • DEPLOY - the site-exposure surface a deploy reviewer needs.