Files
shopdb-flask/plugins/geenforce/api/routes.py
cproudlock 1d7191c2d3 geenforce: the fleet table links where it says, and judges backups instead of dating them
Two fixes to the same table, in the same regions of the same files.

ASSET LINK POINTED AT THE WRONG RECORD. The Asset chip linked
/machines/<assetid>, but /machines/:id keys on machineid - the plugin extension
id - as MachineDetail itself does everywhere. So the link landed on whichever
machine happened to carry that number: a wrong page that looks right, which is
worse than a 404. Same for /measuringtools/. The API now returns
machinepluginid / toolpluginid beside the asset ids and the view links on those.
Both lookups are import-guarded, and with no plugin id the number renders as
plain text rather than a link that misleads. AssetRelationships already resolved
this correctly; this brings the reports table in line.

BACKUP COLUMN READ AS NEGLECT. It showed a raw date, and a revision is only
written when the config CHANGES - dedup means a machine stable for months has a
months-old newest revision and is perfectly healthy. The column already used
lastseenat, the last time the collector CONFIRMED the config, but a bare
timestamp says "nothing has happened since", which at the default 24h collection
interval IS the healthy steady state. It made a working system look stalled and
made the reader do arithmetic against a setting they would have to go and find.

It now returns backupok and shows a badge naming the kind, green when confirmed
recently, red when not, with the date and an explanation in the hover. backupok
is tri-state on purpose: null means no revision at all, and renders as NO badge
rather than a green one, because "never seen" must not read as healthy. The
threshold is the backups plugin's own backups_staledays, read through its
service so there is one definition of stale rather than a second drifting here.

Nothing in the badge is kind-specific, so a backup kind added later inherits it
by existing. docs/BACKUP-KINDS.md records that, the BackupKind contract, and why
the rule is time-based rather than per-kind.
2026-08-13 13:20:15 -04:00

55 KiB